Military Strategies in Iraq- "Air Strikes"

This is an important area for ask because it demonstrates how a different strategic stance might construct enabled the Iraqi military to attain a more kind outcome at the end of the war.

Saddam ibn Talal Hussein's decision to charge Kuwait was due in large part to the "historic and territorial claims that Iraq had over Kuwait" (Bahbah, 1991, p. 50). The invasion resulted from a breakdown in negotiations between the two nations over such issues as: Iraq's economic debt to Kuwait; the ownership of two islands in the Iranian Gulf; and the rights to an oil field in Rumaila, which lies on the fudge of the two countries (Bahbah, 1991, p. 50). Following the invasion, Iraq was subjected to harsh condemnation by the joined States and other Western nations. In response to this condemnation, the United Nations security measure Council passed a series of resolutions which called for the immediate withdrawal of Iraqi promenade from Kuwait. The U.N. as well as imposed economic sanctions against Iraq. These sanctions led to the use of the U.S. navy blue to "interdict Iraqi oil exports and all imports" (Niva, 1991, p. 58).

When Saddam Hussein still refused to leave Kuwait, the U.N. established a January 15, 1991 deadline for his withdrawal. Two years after the passage of this deadline, the United States led a unification of international forces in an

The Principles of warfare model provides a framework for analyzing the respective strategies of the United States and Iraq. accord to this model, the fundamental principle of war is the selection of a strong base of operations from which offensive moves can be do against decisive points in enemy territory. This model also encompasses the splendor of periodliness and choice of proper direction in the writ of execution of dodging. some other way of describing this fundamental principle is to note the brilliance of concentrating one's strength and mass against the enemy's weaknesses (O'Neill & Kass, 1992, p. 228). For the most part, the United States and its allies followed this strategy in the Persian Gulf War.

The coalition's military forces "relied on the timetested principle of pitting strength against exploitable weakness" (O'Neill & Kass, 1992, p. 226). In particular, the mass of coalition forces were focused on the destruction of Iraq's "centers of gravity," such as its commandandcontrol systems and its facilities for the production of weaponry (Triumph without victory, 1992, p. 267). Another example of this principle in action can be seen in the U.S. exploitation of its strength at night trash versus the weakness of the Iraq military to "defend during darkness" (Horner, 1991, p. 22). The U.S. position was also strengthened by the establishment of strong bases for offensive action. In choosing base locations, "sites close enough to the battlefield to ensure the well timed(p) entrance into the fight without unnecessarily jeopardizing the security of the assets were of primary tie in" (Horner, 1991, p. 19). The strategic offense of the U.S. and coalition forces was not entirely flawless. current weaknesses in communications, assessment, and the application of technology were discovered during the course of the war. However, no(prenominal) of these minor deficiencies significantly impacted the course of the coalition's strategy or its successful outcome (Record, 19
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.