NameSubjectProfessorDate_Direction : TRUE / insincere A TRUE B FALSE (The first 25 true /false questions related to issues from characters in the textbook1 . The burning of one s draft card is an example of constitutionally saved symbolic dictionAnswer A2 . The need of disciplines to regulate students in to nurture discipline must be balanced against students freedom of expressionAnswer A3 . enthusiastic of the American flag can be made a criminal act without violating the Constitution p Answer B4 . Although symbolic speech can be protected it may not be protected if it extends to criminal conductAnswer A5 . Prior parapet has been much used by the Supreme tribunal to block policy-making speech that they feel is so unpopular that it should be obstruct from macrocosmationAnswer A6 . Although the Supreme hail has held that education is not a heavy right individual state constitutions can make it a fundamental right at the state levelAnswer B7 . The Supreme Court has held that all affirmative exploit programs are unconstitutionalAnswer A8 . The New York generation . v . United States (1971 ) illustrated the legal point that discipline auspices concerns must trump First Amendment constitutional protectionsAnswer B9 . Prior restraint is frequently used to block publication of materials that could hurt national securityAnswer A10 . Texas v . Johnson (1989 ) illustrates that burning the flag crosses the line and is not protected symbolic speechAnswer B11 . Texas v . Johnson (1989 ) illustrates the point that Congress can fit around the Supreme Court by passing a rightfulness against flag burningAnswer A12 . Tinker v . Des Moines (1969 ) holds that public high school students shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gateAnswer A13 . By their rattling nature , black armbands worn by high school students are disruptive and can be banned by school administratorsAnswer A14 .

In San Antonio v . Rodriguez (1973 ) held that education is so grand to one s life chances that the state of Texas cannot bar the education of the children of irregular aliensAnswer B15 . As a result of the San Antonio case it would be unconstitutional for a state supreme court to equalized funding among poor kids and rich kidsAnswer A16 . In the Bakke (1978 ) case the Supreme Court held that all racial classifications violate the Equal Protection article of the Fourteenth AmendmentAnswer A17 . Cases subsequent to Bakke illustrate that all racial preferences in the awarding of government contracts are unconstitutionalAnswer A18 . The University of Michigan undergraduate and law school admissions cases illustrate how difficult it is to create affirmative action programs that do not impact non-minority studentsAnswer A19 . Although there is a recognise executive privilege , it has been judged to be limited and not absoluteAnswer A20 . The Nixon case stands for the proposition that even presidents are not above the lawAnswer A...If you fatality to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderessayIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.