Good vs. Bad Julius Ceasar

In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved round of Caesars qualities. He was a good and popular attraction and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a occupation with Caesar and plan to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil state of war amid the Romans. This war may contain been pr make upted if Brutus and Cassius had done things a lowly differently. Cassius would pass made a best leader or else than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did not have the morals of a killer give date at Caesar did.         As far as armed forces strategy goes Cassius had the better mindset for it. Brutus was not a very good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good idea to kill Antony. He perspective that Antony would talk the people into trying to kill Brutus and Cassius even though their intentions were good. But Brutus did not want to make it look like a liv estock bath. Also at Caesars funeral, he trusted Antony to say only good things about Brutus and Cassius and not that they are murderers. When Cassius said that they should kill Antony too, Brutus said he did not want to make it look like a blood bath. He was vengeful and explosive.

He argued with Brutus about lying, to the send where they jeopardise each separates lives. Cassius said they should not march to involution of Philippi because it would cloy the troops out and they would not have the advantage of cosmos in their own territory. On the other hand, Brutus thought that if they marched to Philippi they would catch Antonys troops strike guard. Instead of doing what Brutus said, they should have listened to Cassius. !         Although they... If you want to get a proficient essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.