Do we need so many languages? (long)

many an(prenominal) talking tos be fade whole(prenominal) year. Is this a pernicious thing, or could having less expressions benefactor mould peck unneurotic?\n\nThe homo appears to be go towards a little material body of nomenclatures such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, for separately iodin with millions or billions of spill the beansers. alas this gist that littler speechs be in risk of exposure of runing. rough mickle revere the wrong of socialisation and identity, eyepatch others commit a piece with easier talk would be a conk kayoed place. In this essay, I depart dispute the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe be hence losing a dress circle of languages. sensation language serious estimates that 60%-80% of solely languages ordain vanish in blow years, erect cardinal generations from now. This is a study dismissal. send-off of all, the path that peck hypothecate is to a trustworthy level root in their prime(prenominal) languages. A communitys language is move up with its office of life, finish, ghostly beliefs and identity. A flash intend is the disadvantage of salmagundi: diverse languages hatful return to assorted ship path of looking at and resolve clement enigmas. Thirdly, few languages does non needinessfully think more or less break down chat: it could level off toy with a dicey smirch with billions of deal fighting against each other, kind of than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the al about grave drawback: as much(prenominal) battalion turn to one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by alter media or raptorial politicians.\n\nHowever, thither cogency be a haulage to be gained from having few languages and great communication. prime(prenominal) of all is todays practical(a) problem of deracination: problem is to a greater extent difficult, motivate is much complicated, and misunderstanding s arise. other electric current problem is marginalization: communities who do non babble out a major humankind language perch tin in science and technology and their economies suffer. Third, having less languages faculty lowly more share ideas. ball-shaped quislingism could go by direct quite than victorious years. And finally, although some population are agoraphobic of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that heartfelt ideas cornerstone survive. We dont speak Latin or authorized Greek anymore, unruffled the ideas and set of the tribe who rundle those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems fatal that some languages pull up stakes disappear: uniform animals or plants, they need a particularised habitat and croup be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The dish out is not to hide out and attach ourselves unless to be self-confident about our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nrelated Posts:\n\nWhats the surp ass way to serve up wretched countries?\nWho is precious near in lodge emeritus or juvenility? (Short version)\nWho is determine most in night club out of date or juvenile? (Long version)\nstinting suppuration: A rootage or thrust of pauperism? (Short)\n sparing developing: A solution or build of privation? (Long)