Science & Religion

Scientific Models and Religious romancesThe common notion is that science describes the area as it is , while religion must use mediate methods to describe transcendental truth because it is beyond the powers human linguistic process . However , a proper examination of the situation reveals that the frolic of science to descriptive exactitude is unfounded , and that it too must employ indirect methods . The scientist admits to creating ` types to convey the essence of his findings . The scientific specimen is in fact not very different from the unearthly analogy , and both are employing s that are purely applicable elsewhere , but utilize because of their power of insinuation . This essay is an attempt to analyze the similarities and differences between the two , with write to the views of Alister McGrath as expressed in Science and Religion : An entering , as well as those of Mircea Eliade , found in Myth and RealityMcGrath takes the strictly scientific approach . As a case he analyses religious myth very much as an extension to the scientific model Rutherford s of the fragment is a in writing(p) example of the scientific model . The constituents of the constituent cannot possibly be seen Yet by the turn of the twentieth century a wealth of experimental data had accrued surrounding the atom and its constituents . To explain this data the scientists found themselves exercising the resource to greater degrees than usual , and a number of thinkable scenarios sprang up . Rutherford s model proved to be the most meaningful , and has stood the test of succession . He imagined a nucleus at the centre of the atom comprising the protons and neutrons , and the electrons orbiting the nucleus in the manner in which the planets orbit the sunlight . Being the most intuitive picture it aided the belief , and thus was a great fillip in the merely advance of atomic science . Even at the time many scientists realized that such an arrangement was untenable .

If electrons were allowed to short-circuit in the electric field of the nucleus they were bound to eventually lose energy and collapse into the nucleus (Cayne 1981 ,. 387 . Then once again , the protons are very unlikely to reside to subscribe toher in a closely packed nucleus due to coarse repulsion . Despite these overwhelming objections the model stood with the scientific club . This is only due to the overwhelming power to stimulate the imagination that the solar-system model for the atom held , and this is testimony to the role that imagination plays in scientific reasoningA more graphic example is the model used in the kinetic theory of ordnancees In the seventeenth century the Englishman Robert Boyle had empirically determined that the pressure and volume of a gas are inversely proportional to each other , as long as the temperature is kept constant A teensy later the Frenchman Jaques Charles showed that the volume of gas is proportional to the temperature , and long as the pressure is kept constant . Combining the two it is possible to arrive at the ideal gas equationpV kTHere...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .