Judicial Precedent

The meaning of judicial precedent itself is a judgment of the salute used as a starting place for futurity decision making. It is also known as stare decisis which federal agency to stand upon decisions and by which precedents are solid, obligatory and ought to be followed.
By giving judgment of some cases, the judge whitethorn rigid out some facts of the case, state the law that is relevant to the facts and thusly provide his decision. It is only the ratio decidendi which means the legal ratiocination or ground for the judicial decision. It is binding on subsequently courts under the system of judicial precedent. Any surveillance testament be made by the judge on a legal question suggested by the case before him that not arising in such a manner as requiring a decision is known as obiter dicta which means a saying by the way. There may be a number of reasons for a decision provided by the judge in any given judgment and 1 must not take for granted that a reason stub be regarded as obiter because some other ratio has been provided.



Thus, it is not always lenient to differentiate ratio decidendi from obiter dicta when evaluating the effects of a finicky decision.
continue back to the question above, is judicial precedent is best still as a practice of the courts and not as a set of a binding rules? Judicial precedent is considered as an important source of the English Law. Its original precedent is the one which creates and applies a new rule. However, the later decisions, especially of the higher courts, can have a number of effects upon precedents. In particular, they may be reversed, overruled or distinguished.If you want to get a entire essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .