Segregation

Though 1963 was not the year of integration, it was still a act debate throughout the southern states. Merriam-Websters Dictionary defines separatism as the separation or isolation of race, class, or ethnic classify by enforced or voluntary residence in a restricted area, by barriers to social intercourse, by assure educational facilities, or by other discrimitory means. Far later on the integration proclamation those of different ethnic or racial class were discriminated. Colleges and Universities were unhappy with the integration laws, as well as public restaurants and stores. This discrimination was concentrated mostly, if not entirely, in the Confederate states. Those confederates that had seceeded from the Union, could not fathom the idea of integration, much less watch by the laws it set. This caused continuous debate throughout the country. The South did not want integration, they were happy with things the way they were. Yet, the constitution deemed segregation unconstitutional.



The subject field was not whether it was right or wrong, yet would public officials fold there heads at acts against integration. Would the South allow integration to continue, nonetheless though the United States Constitution has clearly set that segregation is unjust.
The act of segregation is cruel and harsh. To isolate an individual completely on the basis of their skin color or spectral beliefs is an unreal concept. It has no concrete basis. To this day, the year 2000, Americans continue to compete with racial and ethnic equality. Segregation is wrong, yet some exit continue to be close-minded and ignorant.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .